Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta The White House. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta The White House. Mostrar todas las entradas

lunes, septiembre 03, 2007

RENEWABLES: The ethanol dreams of George W. Bush, make corn a hot commodity

When Americans fire up their grills for late summer barbecues over the next few weeks, a cloud will be hanging over them in the form of higher prices for steak, chicken and ribs.

The reason can be found in the rapid rise in the cost of corn, which is used not only as food for animals that provide meat, but also as an important basic ingredient used in the production of ethanol in the US.

President George W. Bush unleashed the new popularity of ethanol when he set a goal to lower US dependence on foreign oil. The price of corn has shot up to nearly double 2005 levels in response to the increased demand.

 When Americans fire up their grills for late summer barbecues over the next few weeks, a cloud will be hanging over them in the form of higher prices for steak, chicken and ribs.  The reason can be found in the rapid rise in the cost of corn, which is used not only as food for animals that provide meat, but also as an important basic ingredient used in the production of ethanol in the US.  President George W. Bush unleashed the new popularity of ethanol when he set a goal to lower US dependence on foreign oil. The price of corn has shot up to nearly double 2005 levels in response to the increased demand.  It's no wonder that ethanol refineries are springing up like mushrooms, particularly in mid-western US corn belt states. As of May there were 120 corn refineries countrywide and 75 more were under construction.  The White House's fuel dreams are ambitious. In his State of the Union address in January, Bush set a goal of reducing petrol consumption in the car-loving country by 20 per cent in the next 10 years, largely by turning to ethanol and other alternative fuels.  Ethanol is already mixed in with gasoline, but it accounted for only around 3.5 percent of US fuel consumption last year. Reaching the goal of 15 per cent would require 133 billion litres.  Last year, one-fifth of US corn production was used for ethanol. That compares with 12 per cent two years earlier. Wheat and soybeans also cost more because land used to grow those crops is being turned over to grow corn.  'Anybody that knows anything about the marketing of the corn market knows that when you raise the price of corn you are going to create problems in all of the markets that use corn,' said Ronald Cotterill, director of the Food Marketing Policy Centre at the University of Connecticut, in the Washington Post.  Corn is used not only as feed for chickens, hogs and cattle, it is also used to make high-fructose corn syrup found in products such as cookies and soft drinks. US chocolate maker Hershey has lowered earnings projections because of higher milk costs, and corn flakes producer Kellogg's has raised the price of cereal.  The phenomenon of rising food prices is not limited to the US. Last year food prices rose worldwide about 10 per cent, largely due to more expensive corn, wheat and soybean oil, the International Monetary Fund said in a report early this year. A poor harvest and demand for biofuels in the US are the chief reasons.  Increased demand for biofuels is expected to continue pushing prices for corn and soybean oil higher, the IMF said in its prognosis.  In Mexico the result of higher prices for corn has been dramatic: corn tortillas, a staple of the Mexican diet for 50 million low-income people, suddenly cost double. The government has been forced to intervene with price controls.  Now there is evidence that ethanol made from corn, as it is in the US, is neither cheaper nor cleaner, the magazine Economist reported. The biofuel provides only about 1.5 units of energy for every one unit needed to produce it.  State subsidies lie somewhere between 5.5 billion and 7.3 billion dollars a year, according to the International Institute for Sustainable Development.  Ethanol made from sugar cane, by contrast, produces far more energy than is needed to grow it - an ouput-input ration of about 8-1 - the Economist said. Brazil is the main producer, but Washington has placed duty on the import of sugar cane-based ethanol.  'The US should trash its silly policy. If it stopped taxing good ethanol and subsidizing bad ethanol, the former would flourish, the latter would wither, the world would be greener and the US taxpayer would be richer,' the magazine recommended. It's no wonder that ethanol refineries are springing up like mushrooms, particularly in mid-western US corn belt states. As of May there were 120 corn refineries countrywide and 75 more were under construction.

The White House's fuel dreams are ambitious. In his State of the Union address in January, Bush set a goal of reducing petrol consumption in the car-loving country by 20 per cent in the next 10 years, largely by turning to ethanol and other alternative fuels.

Ethanol is already mixed in with gasoline, but it accounted for only around 3.5 percent of US fuel consumption last year. Reaching the goal of 15 per cent would require 133 billion litres.

Last year, one-fifth of US corn production was used for ethanol. That compares with 12 per cent two years earlier. Wheat and soybeans also cost more because land used to grow those crops is being turned over to grow corn.

'Anybody that knows anything about the marketing of the corn market knows that when you raise the price of corn you are going to create problems in all of the markets that use corn,' said Ronald Cotterill, director of the Food Marketing Policy Centre at the University of Connecticut, in the Washington Post.

Corn is used not only as feed for chickens, hogs and cattle, it is also used to make high-fructose corn syrup found in products such as cookies and soft drinks. US chocolate maker Hershey has lowered earnings projections because of higher milk costs, and corn flakes producer Kellogg's has raised the price of cereal.

The phenomenon of rising food prices is not limited to the US. Last year food prices rose worldwide about 10 per cent, largely due to more expensive corn, wheat and soybean oil, the International Monetary Fund said in a report early this year. A poor harvest and demand for biofuels in the US are the chief reasons.

Increased demand for biofuels is expected to continue pushing prices for corn and soybean oil higher, the IMF said in its prognosis.

In Mexico the result of higher prices for corn has been dramatic: corn tortillas, a staple of the Mexican diet for 50 million low-income people, suddenly cost double. The government has been forced to intervene with price controls.

Now there is evidence that ethanol made from corn, as it is in the US, is neither cheaper nor cleaner, the magazine Economist reported. The biofuel provides only about 1.5 units of energy for every one unit needed to produce it.

State subsidies lie somewhere between 5.5 billion and 7.3 billion dollars a year, according to the International Institute for Sustainable Development.

Ethanol made from sugar cane, by contrast, produces far more energy than is needed to grow it - an ouput-input ration of about 8-1 - the Economist said. Brazil is the main producer, but Washington has placed duty on the import of sugar cane-based ethanol.

'The US should trash its silly policy. If it stopped taxing good ethanol and subsidizing bad ethanol, the former would flourish, the latter would wither, the world would be greener and the US taxpayer would be richer,' the magazine recommended.

 When Americans fire up their grills for late summer barbecues over the next few weeks, a cloud will be hanging over them in the form of higher prices for steak, chicken and ribs.  The reason can be found in the rapid rise in the cost of corn, which is used not only as food for animals that provide meat, but also as an important basic ingredient used in the production of ethanol in the US.  President George W. Bush unleashed the new popularity of ethanol when he set a goal to lower US dependence on foreign oil. The price of corn has shot up to nearly double 2005 levels in response to the increased demand.  It's no wonder that ethanol refineries are springing up like mushrooms, particularly in mid-western US corn belt states. As of May there were 120 corn refineries countrywide and 75 more were under construction.  The White House's fuel dreams are ambitious. In his State of the Union address in January, Bush set a goal of reducing petrol consumption in the car-loving country by 20 per cent in the next 10 years, largely by turning to ethanol and other alternative fuels.  Ethanol is already mixed in with gasoline, but it accounted for only around 3.5 percent of US fuel consumption last year. Reaching the goal of 15 per cent would require 133 billion litres.  Last year, one-fifth of US corn production was used for ethanol. That compares with 12 per cent two years earlier. Wheat and soybeans also cost more because land used to grow those crops is being turned over to grow corn.  'Anybody that knows anything about the marketing of the corn market knows that when you raise the price of corn you are going to create problems in all of the markets that use corn,' said Ronald Cotterill, director of the Food Marketing Policy Centre at the University of Connecticut, in the Washington Post.  Corn is used not only as feed for chickens, hogs and cattle, it is also used to make high-fructose corn syrup found in products such as cookies and soft drinks. US chocolate maker Hershey has lowered earnings projections because of higher milk costs, and corn flakes producer Kellogg's has raised the price of cereal.  The phenomenon of rising food prices is not limited to the US. Last year food prices rose worldwide about 10 per cent, largely due to more expensive corn, wheat and soybean oil, the International Monetary Fund said in a report early this year. A poor harvest and demand for biofuels in the US are the chief reasons.  Increased demand for biofuels is expected to continue pushing prices for corn and soybean oil higher, the IMF said in its prognosis.  In Mexico the result of higher prices for corn has been dramatic: corn tortillas, a staple of the Mexican diet for 50 million low-income people, suddenly cost double. The government has been forced to intervene with price controls.  Now there is evidence that ethanol made from corn, as it is in the US, is neither cheaper nor cleaner, the magazine Economist reported. The biofuel provides only about 1.5 units of energy for every one unit needed to produce it.  State subsidies lie somewhere between 5.5 billion and 7.3 billion dollars a year, according to the International Institute for Sustainable Development.  Ethanol made from sugar cane, by contrast, produces far more energy than is needed to grow it - an ouput-input ration of about 8-1 - the Economist said. Brazil is the main producer, but Washington has placed duty on the import of sugar cane-based ethanol.  'The US should trash its silly policy. If it stopped taxing good ethanol and subsidizing bad ethanol, the former would flourish, the latter would wither, the world would be greener and the US taxpayer would be richer,' the magazine recommended.

Via: Monster & Critics News

Found this post useful? Consider subscribing to
.

sábado, agosto 04, 2007

UNITED STATES: Democrats Split Power Industry in Push for Renewables

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has split the nation's largest utilities such as American Electric Power Co. from their government-owned counterparts in a drive for votes to mandate more renewable energy.

The Democratic proposal to force publicly traded power companies to get 15 percent of their supplies from wind, solar and other renewable sources by 2020 is likely to have only a narrow margin if it succeeds, said Representative Diana DeGette, the plan's sponsor. The House may vote on it as soon as today.

A similar measure that failed in the Senate in June included municipal utilities, rural cooperatives and government power agencies that are excluded from the new bill. The change in the so-called renewable portfolio standard divides two groups that had collaborated to defeat it, forcing investor-owned utilities to step up the fight.

``The difficulty here is that everybody wants to be green and wants to be an environmentalist,'' said David Ratcliffe, chief executive officer of Atlanta-based Southern Co., which sells energy from Mississippi to Florida. A federal mandate is the wrong way to promote alternative energy and will penalize his customers, he said.

The publicly traded companies have lost former allies such as the Tennessee Valley Authority, a federal agency that serves 8.7 million customers. The White House today threatened a veto of the House energy legislation, which would also take $16 billion in tax breaks from oil and gas producers and strengthen energy efficiency rules.

Lobbying Blitz

``It's totally ludicrous to exempt 25 percent of the industry from any kind of a mandate like this,'' said Tom Kuhn, president of the Edison Electric Institute, which represents the largest U.S. utilities, including Southern and American Electric. The lobbying to defeat the measure is ``an all-out blitz,'' Kuhn said in an interview yesterday.

A federal mandate would be a boon to alternative energy companies such as solar panel maker SunPower Corp. and Iberdrola SA's PPM Energy, which develops wind farms. Venture capitalists, with more than $1 billion invested in makers of solar panels and windmills, favor the measure.

Twenty-four states and the District of Columbia already have requirements in place for renewable power purchases. Many of the state laws also exempt municipal utilities, coops and government power agencies.

`Local Control'
The Democrats' decision to exempt the so-called public power suppliers ``reflects a respect for local control,'' said Madalyn Cafruny, a spokeswoman for the American Public Power Association, their lobbying organization in Washington.

The Senate failed to hold a final vote on its version of a renewable portfolio standard before approving energy legislation earlier this year. Any House energy bill would have to be reconciled with Senate legislation and approved by President George W. Bush before becoming law. In a last-ditch effort to gain votes, Democrats have agreed to let utilities meet a portion of the 15 percent portfolio rule with energy efficiency. Up to 4 percent could come from efficiency, DeGette's spokesman Kristofer Eisenla said today.

``I think we are close on the votes,'' DeGette, a Colorado Democrat, said in an interview yesterday. It's not an issue that the House has considered seriously before, so a lot of education has been needed to build support, she said.

Before this year, the Senate approved a renewable portfolio standard three times while the House rejected the idea.

Veto Threat
The White House Office of Management and Budget said in a statement today that the House bills would harm the effort to boost domestic supplies and should be vetoed. It would also hurt the economy and provide no help in addressing climate change, according to the statement, which didn't specifically mention the portfolio standard amendment.

Bush in June threatened to veto the Senate energy bill if it included a national renewable standard. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman has opposed any federal mandate for renewable power.

The National Venture Capital Association, whose members back alternative energy startup companies, sent an Aug. 1 letter to lawmakers urging approval of the standard.

``A signal of long-term congressional support for the renewable energy space is tremendously encouraging,'' wrote Mark Heesen, president of the association. Venture capital firms invested more than $1.2 billion in green technology companies last year, three times more than 2005, he wrote.

``We're dealing with an emerging market that needs some federal support,'' said Michael Carboy, an analyst at Signal Hill Capital Group in San Francisco, referring to solar panel makers. ``The stocks will take off on any positive news from Washington.''

Arm Twisting
Southern's customers would end up spending an extra $13 billion for their power under a renewable resources mandate, according to an analysis from the company that runs through 2030. Georgia, Alabama and other states where Southern operates are disadvantaged because they don't have breezy locations for windmills, according to the company.

Pelosi is pressing hard to get the standard approved, Southern's Ratcliffe said in a telephone interview yesterday. ``There's a great deal of arm-twisting.''

Via: Bloomberg
by Daniel Whitten and Tina Seeley

Blogalaxia Tags:


Label Cloud

The Energy Blog