Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta development. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta development. Mostrar todas las entradas

domingo, marzo 18, 2007

ESPAÑA: La ministra aboga por un nuevo modelo de desarrollo

"Bienvenido sea el interés por el cambio climático, que no es más que la punta de iceberg de la transformación del planeta", expuso la noche del jueves la ministra Narbona ante el auditorio del Foro Joly. Para ésta, ha llegado el momento de "cambiar nuestro modelo de desarrollo económico, avanzar a unas energías limpias, al ahorro y la eficiencia energética". Narbona recordó así el informe realizado por Nicholas Stern sobre los efectos que tendría en la economía global el cambio climático, según el cual "no hacer nada es 20 veces más costoso que reducir la emisión de gases de efecto invernadero". Así, la responsable de Medio Ambiente mantuvo que España gastó, entre 2000 y 2006, 22.000 millones de euros adicionales por las fluctuaciones en el precio del petróleo, mientras que la Estrategia ante el Cambio Climático desarrollada por el Gobierno supone invertir 3.000 millones de euros hasta 2012.

"Estoy convencida de que España es un país con grandes posibilidades de creación de empleo y riqueza en el desarrollo económico", dijo Narbona que apostó por el trabajo conjunto de las administraciones, los empresarios y la comunidad científica. Sobre el futuro energético, la ministra reiteró, al igual que hizo el presidente Zapatero esta semana en el Congreso, que la apuesta del Gobierno para reducir las emisiones de CO2 pasa por la eficiencia energética y el desarrollo de las energías renovables -puso de ejemplo la planta solar termoeléctrica de Sanlúcar Solar- y que no hay vuelta atrás en el plan de demantelar las plantas nucleares.

También descartó el Cabril (Córdoba) como la sede donde se ubicará el nuevo cementerio nuclear, "ya que éste se situará donde exista consenso social y político, y es evidente que en esta localidad no lo hay".

Granada Hoy

sábado, marzo 17, 2007

PROJECTS: Hydropower Rehabilitation Project in support of the Energy Sector Reform and Development Program

Hydropower Rehabilitation Project in support of the Energy Sector Reform and Development Program opera a Ucraïna.
This project comprises five components.
  1. Rehabilitation of hydroelectric plants. This component includes refurbishment of 46 hydroelectric units and associated plant equipment at nine hydroelectric plants operated by UkrHydroEnergo (UHE). It also includes modernization of hydropower plants and refurbishment of high voltage equipment in nine switchyards connected to these plants.
  2. Dam Safety. This component includes rehabilitation and upgrade of the existing, as well as installation of new dam safety monitoring systems and rehabilitation of drainage facilities and spillway gates on seven dams on the Dnipro river and one dam on the Dnister river.
  3. UHE Institutional Development. This component includes establishment of a corporate-wide Management Information System (MIS) in UHE. This component also includes provision of technical assistance to UHE in improving financial management, enhancing dam safety, optimal scheduling of the multipurpose cascade of hydropower plants, capacity building in procurement and project management and training for the UHE staff in dam safety.
  4. MFE Institutional Development. This component includes provision to the Ministry of Fuel and Energy (MFE) of advisory services and consultant assistance in developing and implementing: (i) an action plan for legal and technical harmonization of the Ukraine’s energy market with the European Union Internal Energy Market; and (ii) a program of priority investments and technical assistance in the energy sector.
  5. Implementation of the WEM Concept. This component includes provision of technical assistance to the National Energy Regulatory Commission in implementing the Wholesale Electricity Market (WEM) concept, as required for (i) clarifying market design and main principles of market operation; (ii) drafting of main codes and rules; and (iii) specifying the supporting tools such as software, telecommunication systems and metering.

Aquest comprador es part de Banc Mundial.

jueves, febrero 15, 2007

In a Corner of Virginia’s ‘Switzerland,’ a Division Over a Planned Wind Farm



MONTEREY, Va. — Wes Maupin says he will move this spring to a 20-acre spread here in remote Highland County, a pastoral place where sheep outnumber people and where little has changed since his boyhood, when he fished the county’s mountain streams with his father.

Mr. Maupin, a 52-year-old former corrections worker, does have one misgiving, though. Like many others in Highland, known for its rustic heights as Virginia’s Switzerland, he finds no joy in the prospect that these blustery Allegheny ridges could soon become home to the state’s first wind farm: 19 wind turbines, each taller than the Statue of Liberty, its pedestal included.
“Any wind farm,” Mr. Maupin said, “would surely change the character of this county forever.”
Much as disputes over the aesthetics, economics and environmental impact of wind farms have arisen in Vermont, Massachusetts, North Carolina and elsewhere, the proposed project here, first put forth eight years ago, has divided the 2,500 residents of Highland County, one of the least populated counties east of the Mississippi. Where some see unwelcome industrialization of the wilderness, others see green energy and an estimated $200,000 a year in tax revenue for the financially needy county.
Though the farm would sit on only 50 acres of the county’s 416 square miles, many fear it would be just the vanguard of similar local projects providing electricity for the regional grid.
“People around the state feel Highland should be sacrificed because not too many people live here,” said Sandy Bratton, 64, a fourth-generation landowner. “They view us as docile, uneducated people.”
But at Grady’s Barber Shop here in Monterey, the county seat, 35 miles west of Staunton, Roy Waggoner said he supported the $60 million project.
“One way to clean up the environment is with the wind turbines; it’s green energy,” said Mr. Waggoner, 57, a sheep rancher. “I don’t want to see them on every inch of land, but that ridge is very secluded.”
To be sure, the wind farm still faces hurdles. Though local officials have approved it, opponents have sued them in an effort to overturn their decision. Federal and state agencies oppose the project until sufficient bat, bird and other environmental studies are done. Further, a state hearing examiner is not expected to decide until March whether to recommend that the Virginia Corporation Commission issue a permit allowing the developer, Highland New Wind Development, to build and operate the turbines.
The man behind the project is Henry McBride, retired poultry farmer and founder of Highland New Wind. Mr. McBride intends to build the windmills on a part of his 4,000-acre ranch here not far from the West Virginia state line. He will sell electricity directly to a utility, a city, an energy cooperative or another power purchaser, said a family spokesman, Frank Maisano, a wind energy lobbyist in Washington. The project would generate 39 megawatts, enough for more than 15,000 homes, Mr. Maisano said.
Highland County has long worked to promote ecotourism; the number of lodgings that cater to birders, hikers and other visitors has tripled in the last decade. But since the wind farm was proposed, queries from people thinking of moving here have dropped to about 50 a year from 325, said Carolyn Pohowsky, executive director of the Highland County Chamber of Commerce.
“It has been a very controversial and polarizing issue,” Ms. Pohowsky said. “Because this is a new industry in the state of Virginia, we have no idea of what the outcome will be. You not only have the family farm at risk, and your livelihood at risk, but your heritage at risk.”
Jerry Rexrode, a county supervisor who voted to approve a conditional use permit for the wind farm in 2005, said most people he had talked to supported the project. David Jessee, manager of an auto parts store, said of the turbines: “I don’t see a thing wrong with them. Economically, the windmills would draw in a little money and maybe bring everyone up around here.”
But Randy Richardson, president of Highlanders for Responsible Development, a group that opposes the project, said people worried about noise pollution from the turbines’ blades and light pollution from the red strobes that would alert aircraft to the 400-foot-tall structures.
“We actually had some guy saying these will be similar to the windmills in Holland,” Mr. Richardson said. “Well, there is a little bit of difference between a quaint Dutch windmill and a 400-foot turbine.”
Tom Brody and Patti Reum own Bear Mountain Farm and Wilderness Retreat, a lodging and environmental center that attracts birders, stargazers and hikers. It is near the site of the proposed turbines.
If development proceeded, “we would have to leave,” Ms. Reum said. “If our business doesn’t make it, we can’t live here.”
NY Times

Label Cloud

The Energy Blog